MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W184777696

Farm Animal Behaviour — Characteristics for Assessment of Health and Welfare

2013· article· en· W184777696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
B.W.R. Rothwell

Bibliographic record

VenueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDomesticationAnimal welfareWelfareNatural (archaeology)OddsInclusion (mineral)Animal husbandryAgricultureEnvironmental ethicsBiologyGeographyEcologyPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychologyLogistic regressionMedicineLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author of this comprehensive, but not exhaustive, undergraduate level text demonstrates thorough knowledge of his subject and current world literature, with the inclusion of over 670 references in this work, many authors known to us in Canada for their studies in animal welfare over the preceding 3 to 4 decades. The book is well-organized in 3 sections, covering horses, cattle, swine, sheep, and goats in part I, poultry and farmed birds in part II, and non-domesticated deer to include only fallow and red deer in part III. Quality illustrations in black and white clearly complement points discussed in the text. Not covered are other deer species currently farmed on the NA continent, bison or alpaca, although much is known of their natural behavior, and as farming enterprises. Consideration might be given to the inclusion of these animals in a future edition. Each chapter follows a consistent pattern describing the behavioral characteristics of the species featured. Reference is made to the natural state before domestication, leading us through the various changes to the present, demonstrating along the way recognized behavioral needs of animals subject to modern management systems. Innate, learned, and social behaviors, activity patterns, senses, behavior in the young animal, vision and hearing, mating, pregnancy, birthing, and mothering are chronicled for each animal species within natural and artificial settings. Clearly, the pendulum has swung far in favor of production oriented systems of animal management considering the behavioral needs of animals, and often at odds with them and optimal welfare. By example, the author demonstrates problems currently encountered due this emphasis, leading us to look at the normal, enabling recognition of the abnormal. Ekesbo has a great ability to encourage the reader to think about what is written, coming to one’s own conclusions. Many influences affect our judgement, reasonable and unreasonable, today. This is a book of observation and truth, of great worth to anyone in a caring or advisory role. Those who have managed the animals and birds covered over a period of several decades will acknowledge what they have learned in the field is now documented in print; for those now entering the world of animal agriculture, author Ekesbo has done them a great favor with the publication of this text!

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)Same topicInsect Utilization and EffectsFrench-language works237,207