Tsunami: massively parallel homomorphic hashing on many‐core GPUs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY Homomorphic hash functions play a key role in securing distributed systems that use coding techniques such as erasure coding and network coding. The computational complexity of homomorphic hash functions remains a main challenge. In this paper, we present a massively parallel solution, named Tsunami, by exploiting the widely available many‐core graphic processing units (GPUs). Tsunami includes the following optimization techniques to achieve the highest ever hashing throughput: (1) using Montgomery multiplication and precomputation to speed up modular exponentiations; (2) using a clean implementation of Montgomery multiplication in order to decrease the demand of registers and shared memory and increase the utilization ratio of GPU processing cores; (3) using our own assembly code to implement the 32‐bit integer multiplication, which outperforms the assembly codes generated by the native compiler by 20%; and (4) exploiting memory alignment and constant memory on GPUs to improve the efficiency of memory access. Integrating the above techniques, our Tsunami achieves a significant improvement over existing results. Specifically, the hashing throughput achieved by Tsunami on a GTX295 GPU (NVIDIA, Santa Clara, CA, US) is about 33 times that of the existing solution on a quad‐core CPU. We also show that the hashing throughput grows almost linearly with the number of GPU cores. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".