Fundamental invariants for the action of $SL_3(\mathbb {C}) \times SL_3(\mathbb {C}) \times SL_3(\mathbb {C})$ on $3 \times 3 \times 3$ arrays
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We determine the three fundamental invariants in the entries of a $3 \times 3 \times 3$ array over $\mathbb {C}$ as explicit polynomials in the 27 variables $x_{ijk}$ for $1 \le i, j, k \le 3$. By the work of Vinberg on $\theta$-groups, it is known that these homogeneous polynomials have degrees 6, 9 and 12; they freely generate the algebra of invariants for the Lie group $SL_3(\mathbb {C}) \times SL_3(\mathbb {C}) \times SL_3(\mathbb {C})$ acting irreducibly on its natural representation $\mathbb {C}^3 \otimes \mathbb {C}^3 \otimes \mathbb {C}^3$. These generators have, respectively, 1152, 9216 and 209061 terms; we find compact expressions in terms of the orbits of the finite group $( S_3 \times S_3 \times S_3 ) \rtimes S_3$ acting on monomials of weight zero for the action of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak {sl}_3(\mathbb {C}) \oplus \mathfrak {sl}_3(\mathbb {C}) \oplus \mathfrak {sl}_3(\mathbb {C})$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it