MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1866157285 · doi:10.1109/wcica.2002.1020799

A remote control system using Java and CORBA architecture

2003· article· en· W1866157285 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCommon Object Request Broker ArchitectureComputer scienceThe InternetClient–server modelOperating systemJavaApplication serverEmbedded systemClientServerFat clientComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membranes hold promise as a new water treatment method of the future. In this study, a device is designed to test the efficiency of membranes. The device is implemented to be controlled remotely. An Internet based remote control system is implemented on the membrane test device to make the users access to it easier. When using the system, a remote operator only needs a general purpose computer with Internet connection to conduct a test. The engineering objective is to perform robust control over the Internet connection. A control architecture that combines computer and the membrane testing hardware is built. This system has two primary parts, the server part and the client part. A server is used to provide the application to the operator to control the hardware. The client part is executed on the remote operator's computer. The client uses a TCP/IP protocol to connect to the server through the Internet. Communication coordination between the client and the server is developed using Java and Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it