MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Characterization of Stockwell Spectra

2006· book-chapter· en· W187337751 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBirkhäuser Basel eBooks · 2006
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Signal Denoising Methods
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsS transformConstant Q transformAlgorithmWavelet transformParameterized complexityInterpretation (philosophy)Gabor transformComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Continuous wavelet transformTime–frequency analysisDomain (mathematical analysis)Harmonic wavelet transformSimple (philosophy)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformComputer visionMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signals in real applications are typically finite in duration, dynamic and non-stationary processes with frequency characteristics varying over time. This often requires techniques capable of locally analyzing and processing signals. An integral transform known as the Stockwell transform is a combination of the classic Gabor transform and the current and versatile wavelet transform. It allows more accurate detection of subtle changes and easy interpretation in the time-frequency domain. In this paper, we study the mathematical underpinnings of the Stockwell transform. We look at the Stockwell transform as a stack of simple pseudo-differential operators parameterized by frequencies and give a complete description of the Stockwell spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.635
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it