MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W189026918

LINEAR AND NONLINEAR MODEL PREDICTIVE CONTROL DESIGN FOR A MILK PASTEURIZATION PLANT

2003· article· en· W189026918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueControl and Intelligent Systems · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlControl theory (sociology)Benchmark (surveying)PID controllerNonlinear systemArtificial neural networkLinear modelController (irrigation)Operating pointNonlinear modelSmith predictorControl engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceTemperature controlControl (management)Artificial intelligenceMachine learning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the design of linear and nonlinear model predictive controllers (MPCs) in order to improve the control of pasteurization temperature in a milk plant. MPC schemes required the development of a prediction model for use internally within the controller. An artificial neural network (ANN) model of the plant is established and validated. A linearized model is then obtained around the operating point from the ANN model. The linearized and the ANN models are used for prediction for the linear and nonlinear predictive controllers, respectively. The MPC responses are compared with a benchmark PID controller behaviour, the parameters of which have been tuned to minimize the same criteria as used for the predictive controllers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.993
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it