MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1890853394 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2001.980970

A novel model reduction method for sheet forming processes using wavelet packets

2003· article· en· W1890853394 on OpenAlexaff
Junqiang Fan, Guy A. Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControllabilityWaveletWavelet packet decompositionReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceNetwork packetActuatorDimension (graph theory)ScalingAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Controller (irrigation)Wavelet transformMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-directional control of sheet forming processes, such as a paper machine, can involve up to 600 inputs and 3000 outputs. For such large-scale systems, it is necessary to find proper model reduction strategies before starting controller design. The paper introduces a model reduction method for such processes based on an efficient modified wavelet packet algorithm. The large dimensional signals in the spatial domain can be transformed into a small number of scaling and wavelet coefficients in the wavelet domain, thus the dimension of the original input-output model is reduced without losing any significant information. Two additional benefits are obtained: (1) the system's controllability can be significantly improved because the system's condition number is greatly decreased, (2) the physical limits of the actuators can be directly transformed from the original model to the reduced model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228)Same topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207