MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1890853394 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2001.980970

A novel model reduction method for sheet forming processes using wavelet packets

2003· article· en· W1890853394 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.01CH37228) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControllabilityWaveletWavelet packet decompositionReduction (mathematics)Computer scienceNetwork packetActuatorDimension (graph theory)ScalingAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Domain (mathematical analysis)Controller (irrigation)Wavelet transformMathematicsControl (management)Artificial intelligenceApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cross-directional control of sheet forming processes, such as a paper machine, can involve up to 600 inputs and 3000 outputs. For such large-scale systems, it is necessary to find proper model reduction strategies before starting controller design. The paper introduces a model reduction method for such processes based on an efficient modified wavelet packet algorithm. The large dimensional signals in the spatial domain can be transformed into a small number of scaling and wavelet coefficients in the wavelet domain, thus the dimension of the original input-output model is reduced without losing any significant information. Two additional benefits are obtained: (1) the system's controllability can be significantly improved because the system's condition number is greatly decreased, (2) the physical limits of the actuators can be directly transformed from the original model to the reduced model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it