MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1891577001 · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.129

Moving Mesh Methods on Parametric Surfaces

2015· article· en· W1891577001 on OpenAlexafffund
Benjamin Crestel, Robert D. Russell, Steven J. Ruuth

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsParametric statisticsComputer scienceParametric surfaceMaterials scienceGeometryStructural engineeringComputer graphics (images)GeologyEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many phenomena in the applied and natural sciences occur on surfaces. To solve accurately the corresponding partial differential equations (PDEs), it is often necessary to adapt the mesh, based upon the geometry of the surface, or based upon the behaviour of the PDE solution. Moving mesh methods are particularly efficient strategies in many situations. PDEs explicitly involving the mesh speed, called moving mesh PDEs (MMPDEs), offer a robust technique to adapt the mesh. In this work, we implement, with the C++ finite element library deal.II, a mesh adaptation based on Winslow's adaptation functional. We generalize the moving mesh problem to curved surfaces by deriving appropriate mathematical and finite element formulations. Furthermore, a simple method using surface parameterization is developed and implemented using deal.II. The results, for both fixed and dynamically adapting meshes, demonstrate the effectiveness of the method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProcedia EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Numerical Methods in Computational MathematicsFrench-language works237,207