MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1891749599

Flexible Polyethylene Terephthalate-based inkjet printed CPW-fed monopole antenna for 60 GHz ISM applications

2013· article· en· W1891749599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton UniversityCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolyethylene terephthalateMaterials scienceInkwellConductive inkOptoelectronicsScreen printingReturn lossElectrical conductorAntenna (radio)Composite materialElectrical engineeringSheet resistance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates an inkjet-printed millimetre-wave antenna on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) substrate. The 60 GHz CPW-fed monopole antenna was printed with a DMP-2800 series inkjet printing system. A silver nanoparticle colloidal solution was used as the printing ink. First, this process uses a plasma polymerization technique to improve the PET surface or printing. Then, silver lines are inkjet printed on the PET substrate, followed by curing in an oven to remove excess solvent and material impurities. The multiple-pass lines are printed to study the changes in surface roughness and line width. The silver film conductivity of the conductive ink is around 4×106 S/m. The measured impedance bandwidth of the printed antenna, defined by return loss less than -10 dB, is from 60 to 65 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it