MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1892120934 · doi:10.1214/18-aop1258

Structure of optimal martingale transport plans in general dimensions

2018· preprint· en· W1892120934 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nassif Ghoussoub, Young‐Heon Kim, Tongseok Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Probability · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicPoint processes and geometric inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaShanghaiTech UniversityAustrian Science FundEuropean Commission
KeywordsProbability measureMartingale (probability theory)MathematicsLebesgue measureCombinatoricsDisjoint setsAbsolute continuityMeasure (data warehouse)Borel measureCountable setConvex hullRandom measureDiscrete mathematicsRegular polygonLebesgue integrationPure mathematicsApplied mathematicsComputer scienceGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given two probability measures $\mu$ and $\nu$ in “convex order” on $\mathbb{R}^{d}$, we study the profile of one-step martingale plans $\pi$ on $\mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathbb{R}^{d}$ that optimize the expected value of the modulus of their increment among all martingales having $\mu$ and $\nu$ as marginals. While there is a great deal of results for the real line (i.e., when $d=1$), much less is known in the richer and more delicate higher-dimensional case that we tackle in this paper. We show that many structural results can be obtained, provided the initial measure $\mu$ is absolutely continuous with respect to the Lebesgue measure. One such a property is that $\mu$-almost every $x$ in $\mathbb{R}^{d}$ is transported by the optimal martingale plan into a probability measure $\pi_{x}$ concentrated on the extreme points of the closed convex hull of its support. This will be established for the distance cost $c(x,y)=\vert x-y\vert $ in the two-dimensional case, and also for any $d\geq3$ as long as the marginals are in “subharmonic order.” In some cases, $\pi_{x}$ is supported on the vertices of a $k(x)$-dimensional polytope, such as when the target measure is discrete. Duality plays a crucial role in our approach, even though, in contrast to standard optimal transports, the dual extremal problem may not be attained in general. We show however that “martingale supporting” Borel subsets of $\mathbb{R}^{d}\times\mathbb{R}^{d}$ can be decomposed into a collection of mutually disjoint components by means of a “convex paving” of the source space, in such a way that when the martingale is optimal for a general cost function, each of the components then supports a restricted optimal martingale transport whose dual problem is attained. This decomposition is used to obtain structural results in cases where global duality is not attained. On the other hand, it shows that certain “optimal martingale supporting” Borel sets can be viewed as higher-dimensional versions of Nikodym-type sets. The paper focuses on the distance cost, but much of the results hold for general Lipschitz cost functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.181
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Annals of ProbabilitySame topicPoint processes and geometric inequalitiesFrench-language works237,207