MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1900838388 · doi:10.3138/topia.21.9

MCS Matters: Material Agency in the Science and Practices of Environmental Illness

2009· article· en· W1900838388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTOPIA Canadian Journal of Cultural Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMateriality (auditing)EnvironmentalismAgency (philosophy)Strict constructionismPosthumanismFeminismSociologyEnvironmental ethicsEpistemologyPoliticsEnvironmental sociologySocial scienceAestheticsPolitical sciencePhilosophyGender studiesLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If nature is to matter, we need more potent, more complex understandings of materiality. New conceptions of materiality, which are neither biologically reductive nor strictly social constructionist, are emerging in science studies, environmental philosophy, corporeal feminism, disability studies and other fields. This essay analyzes scientific, popular and autobiographical accounts of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS), or environmental illness, arguing that this condition provokes new models of material agency as well as new forms of environmentalism. The material agency of MCS epitomizes “trans-corporeality”—the recognition that the substance of the human is co-extensive with the emergent, more-than-human world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.803
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it