MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910095387 · doi:10.5555/2830865.2830883

Exp-HE: a family of fast exponentiation algorithms resistant to SPA, fault, and combined attacks

2015· article· en· W1910095387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEmbedded Software · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalar multiplicationModular exponentiationSide channel attackCryptographyPower analysisExponentiationAlgorithmElliptic curve cryptographyTiming attackModular arithmeticCryptosystemVulnerability (computing)Public-key cryptographyTheoretical computer scienceComputer engineeringEmbedded systemElliptic curveComputer securityEncryptionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security and privacy are growing concerns in modern embedded software, given the increasing level of connectivity as well as complexity and features in embedded devices. Use of cryptographic techniques is often a requirement on which the security of the device relies. However, important challenges arise when potential attackers have physical access to the device. Side-channel analysis, including simple power analysis (SPA), is a class of powerful non-intrusive attacks that are suitable for adversaries with physical access to the device. Countermeasures exist, but they typically involve a considerable performance penalty, and some of them in turn introduce a vulnerability to induced fault attacks. In this work, we present several new efficient cryptographic exponentiation algorithms that work by splitting the exponent in two halves for simultaneous processing while using special representations derived from signed-digit encoding that improve computational efficiency. A key detail in the design of these algorithms is that they are compatible with the idea of buffering the operations to provide resistance to SPA. Experimental results are presented, including implementations of the proposed methods with both modular integer exponentiation and elliptic curve (ECC) scalar multiplication. We also performed statistical analysis of the traces, showing that trace segments for different exponent bits are statistically indistinguishable. Our proposed techniques also exhibit better resistance against fault attacks and combined fault and side-channel attacks, compared to previous SPA-resistant techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.563
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it