MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1910412336 · doi:10.1002/oca.2190

Symmetries and analytical solutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equation for a class of optimal control problems

2015· article· en· W1910412336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOptimal Control Applications and Methods · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSphingolipid Metabolism and Signaling
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equationMathematicsOptimal controlRiccati equationBellman equationDifferentiable functionHomogeneous spaceApplied mathematicsAffine transformationOrdinary differential equationDifferential equationAdjoint equationPartial differential equationMathematical analysisMathematical optimizationPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The main contribution of this paper is to identify explicit classes of locally controllable second‐order systems and optimization functionals for which optimal control problems can be solved analytically, assuming that a differentiable optimal cost‐to‐go function exists for such control problems. An additional contribution of the paper is to obtain a Lyapunov function for the same classes of systems. The paper addresses the Lie point symmetries of the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman (HJB) equation for optimal control of second‐order nonlinear control systems that are affine in a single input and for which the cost is quadratic in the input. It is shown that if there exists a dilation symmetry of the HJB equation for optimal control problems in this class, this symmetry can be used to obtain a solution. It is concluded that when the cost on the state preserves the dilation symmetry, solving the optimal control problem is reduced to finding the solution to a first‐order ordinary differential equation. For some cases where the cost on the state breaks the dilation symmetry, the paper also presents an alternative method to find analytical solutions of the HJB equation corresponding to additive control inputs. The relevance of the proposed methodologies is illustrated in several examples for which analytical solutions are found, including the Van der Pol oscillator and mass–spring systems. Furthermore, it is proved that in the well‐known case of a linear quadratic regulator, the quadratic cost is precisely the cost that preserves the dilation symmetry of the equation. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it