MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1918100329 · doi:10.1002/ocea.5109

<scp>J</scp>erusalem and <scp>M</scp>alaita: The Visions and Prophecies of <scp>G</scp>eorge <scp>U</scp>mai of <scp>W</scp>est <scp>K</scp>wara'ae, <scp>M</scp>alaita, <scp>S</scp>olomon <scp>I</scp>slands

2015· article· en· W1918100329 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOceania · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisionTheocracyGeorge (robot)Religious studiesTheologyHistoryAncient historyPhilosophyArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper I examine the visions and teachings of G eorge U mai (c.1938–1998), an A nglican lay leader of W est K wara'ae, M alaita, S olomon I slands. In his prophecies, U mai traced M alaitans, S olomon Islanders, and many other O ceanic peoples to his ancestors who he claimed fled from J erusalem to M alaita in CE 62. According to U mai, they brought the A rk of the C ovenant from the J erusalem T emple to K wara'ae, M alaita where they buried it. I examine U mai's vision of the A rk of the C ovenant and its apocalyptic and theocratic significance for M alaita and the world. In U mai's visions, teachings, and practice, M alaitan, J ewish, and C hristian genealogy, apocalypse, and theocracy came together in a distinctive ethno‐theology that paralleled similar and prefigured later religious movements in M alaita but was too idiosyncratic to sustain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.094
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.094
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.004
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0090.014
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0100.007
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it