MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1921706053 · doi:10.1214/lnms/1215091934

Spearman's rho and Kendall's tau for multivariate data sets

2003· book-chapter· en· W1921706053 on OpenAlexaff
Hamani El Maâche, Yves Lepage

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes-monograph series · 2003
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsMultivariate analysisStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A class of U-statistics matrices is introduced to obtain the distribution of the matrices of the Spearman and Kendall correlation coefficients between the components of a random vector.These results are used to construct nonparametric tests of independence between two sets of variables based on three measures of multivariate relationship.The tests are illustrated by an example and a simulation study is performed to compare the tests based on Kendall's matrix with those based on Spearman's matrix.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.033
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.012
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.403
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes-monograph seriesSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207