On Convergence of Series of Random Elements via Maximal Moment Relations with Applications to Martingale Convergence and to Convergence of Series with <i>p</i>-Orthogonal Summands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rate of convergence for an almost surely convergent series of Banach space valued random elements is studied in this paper. As special cases of the main result, known results are obtained for a sequence of independent random elements in a Rademacher type p Banach space, and new results are obtained for a martingale difference sequence of random elements in a martingale type p Banach space and for a p-orthogonal sequence of random elements in a Rademacher type p Banach space. The current work generalizes, simplifies, and unifies some of the recent results of Nam and Rosalsky [Teor. Īmovīr. ta Mat. Statist. 52: 120–131, 1995] and Rosalsky and Rosenblatt [Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica 11: 185–208, 1983, Nonlinear Anal. 30: 4237–4248, 1997].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.049 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".