MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prevalence of bruising at the vascular access site one week after elective cardiac catheterisation or percutaneous coronary intervention

2011· article· en· W1925545485 on OpenAlexafffund
Tammy Cosman, Heather M. Arthur, Madhu K. Natarajan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Nursing · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityHamilton Health Sciences
FundersRegistered Nurses' Association of Ontario
KeywordsMedicineVascular closure deviceConventional PCIPercutaneous coronary interventionPercutaneousCardiac catheterisationCardiac catheterizationComplicationSurgeryIncidence (geometry)Myocardial infarctionCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To identify the prevalence and predictors of VAS bruising in the 5-7 days following cardiac catheterisation or percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Complication(s) of cardiac catheterisation and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) occur commonly at the vascular access site (VAS). While major complications, such as retroperitoneal bleeding, are evident before hospital discharge, the prevalence of VAS bruising in the early post-discharge period is undocumented. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHOD: Data were collected on 172 patients following cardiac catheterisation and/or PCI through (1) chart review, (2) pre-discharge assessment and (3) telephone follow up 5-7 days post-discharge. RESULTS: At the time of telephone follow up bruising was reported in 68.6% of all patients (n = 118), with 47% of those patients (n = 56) reporting bruises larger than 7.5 cm (3 inches). Incidence of bruising varied by access site; 73% of patients (n = 86) who had femoral access, 83% (n = 5) with femoral access plus closure device and 60% (n = 17) of patients with radial access reported bruising 5-7 days post-discharge. Bivariate analysis revealed a significant association between female sex and post discharge bruising (χ(2) 10.490, p = 0.001), with a likelihood ratio of 11.20. Abciximab use during the procedure was associated with post discharge bruising (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.045). Logistic regression analysis revealed female sex as a significant predictor of bruising after discharge (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the majority of patients will experience significant bruising at the VAS following discharge and that women may be more at risk. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The high prevalence of post-discharge bruising after cardiac catheterisation and/or PCI has important implications for nursing education and preparation of patients prior to hospital discharge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical NursingSame topicVascular Procedures and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207