Study of both fingerprint and high wavenumber Raman spectroscopy of pathological nasopharyngeal tissues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High wavenumber (HW) Raman spectroscopy has weaker fluorescence background compared with fingerprint (FP) region. This study aims to evaluate the discrimination feasibility of nasopharyngeal non‐cancerous and nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) tissue with both FP and HW Raman spectroscopy. HW Raman spectra of nasopharyngeal tissue were obtained for the first time. Raman spectra were collected to differentiate nasopharyngeal non‐cancerous ( n = 37) from NPC ( n = 41) tissues in FP (800–1800cm −1 ), HW (2700–3100cm −1 ), and integrated FP/HW region. First, to assess the utility of this method, the averaged Raman spectral intensities and intensity ratios of corresponding Raman bands were analyzed in HW and FP regions, respectively. The results show that intensities as well as the ratios of specific Raman peaks might be helpful in distinguishing nasopharyngeal non‐cancerous from NPC tissue with the HW Raman spectroscopy, as with FP Raman reported before. The multivariate statistical method based on the combination of principal component analysis–liner discriminant analysis (PCA‐LDA), together with leave‐one‐patient‐out, cross‐validation diagnostic algorithm, was used for discriminating nasopharyngeal non‐cancerous from NPC tissue, generating sensitivities of 87.8%, 85.4%, and 95.1% and specificities of 86.5%, 91.9%, and 89.2%, respectively, with Raman spectroscopy in the FP, HW, and integrated FP/HW regions. The posterior probability of classification results and receiver operating characteristic curves were utilized to evaluate the discrimination of PCA‐LDA algorithm, verifying that HW Raman spectroscopy has a positive effect on the differentiation for the diagnosis of NPC tissue by integrated FP/HW Raman spectroscopy. What's more, the potential of Raman spectroscopy used for differentiating different pathology NPC tissues was also discussed. The results demonstrate that both FP and HW Raman spectroscopy have the potential for diagnosis and detection in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and HW Raman spectroscopy may improve the discrimination of NPC tissue compared with FP region alone, providing a promising diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of NPC tissue. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".