Neogene overflow of Northern Component Water at the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the North Atlantic Ocean, flow of North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), and of its ancient counterpart Northern Component Water (NCW), across the Greenland‐Scotland Ridge (GSR) is thought to have played an important role in ocean circulation. Over the last 60 Ma, the Iceland Plume has dynamically supported an area which encompasses the GSR. Consequently, bathymetry of the GSR has varied with time due to a combination of lithospheric plate cooling and fluctuations in the temperature and buoyancy within the underlying convecting mantle. Here, we reassess the importance of plate cooling and convective control on this northern gateway for NCW flow during the Neogene period, following Wright and Miller (1996). To tackle the problem, benthic foraminiferal isotope data sets have been assembled to examine δ13C gradients between the three major deep water masses (i.e., Northern Component Water, Southern Ocean Water, and Pacific Ocean Water). Composite records are reported on an astronomical timescale, and a nonparametric curve‐fitting technique is used to produce regional estimates of δ13C for each water mass. Confidence bands were calculated, and error propagation techniques used to estimate %NCW and its uncertainty. Despite obvious reservations about using long‐term variations of δ13C from disparate analyses and settings, and despite considerable uncertainties in our understanding of ancient oceanic transport pathways, the variation of NCW through time is consistent with independent estimates of the temporal variation of dynamical support associated with the Iceland Plume. Prior to 12 Ma, δ13C patterns overlap and %NCW cannot be isolated. Significant long‐period variations are evident, which are consistent with previously published work. From 12 Ma, when lithospheric cooling probably caused the GSR to submerge completely, long‐period δ13C patterns diverge significantly and allow reasonable %NCW estimates to be made. Our most robust result is a dramatic increase in NCW overflow between 6 and 2 Ma when dynamical support generated by the Iceland Plume was weakest. Between 6 and 12 Ma a series of variations in NCW overflow have been resolved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".