On the Range of the Douglas–Rachford Operator
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The problem of finding a minimizer of the sum of two convex functions—or, more generally, that of finding a zero of the sum of two maximally monotone operators—is of central importance in variational analysis. Perhaps the most popular method of solving this problem is the Douglas–Rachford splitting method. Surprisingly, little is known about the range of the Douglas–Rachford operator. In this paper, we set out to study this range systematically. We prove that for 3 * monotone operators a very pleasing formula can be found that reveals the range to be nearly equal to a simple set involving the domains and ranges of the underlying operators. A similar formula holds for the range of the corresponding displacement mapping. We discuss applications to subdifferential operators, to the infimal displacement vector, and to firmly nonexpansive mappings. Various examples and counterexamples are presented, including some concerning the celebrated Brezis–Haraux theorem.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it