MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1933776184 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2001.933530

Predictive reliability assessment of distribution systems including extreme adverse weather

2002· article· en· W1933776184 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse weatherReliability (semiconductor)Extreme weatherWeather forecastingComputer scienceWeather predictionMeteorologySevere weatherEnvironmental scienceNumerical weather predictionModel output statisticsReliability engineeringEngineeringStormClimate changeGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The physical environment in which a distribution system resides has a major effect on the resulting reliability of the network. The physical stress placed on system components can be much higher in bad weather than that encountered under normal weather conditions. The conventional approach to incorporate bad weather in the predictive assessment of redundant transmission line facilities is to divide the overall weather conditions into the two states of normal and adverse weather. This paper illustrates the conventional approach to predictive reliability assessment using a two-state weather model and extends these concepts to recognize extremely adverse weather conditions. The resulting three-state weather model is presented and analyzed to illustrate the applicability of the model and the impact of dividing bad weather into the two categories of adverse and major adverse weather.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.469

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower System Reliability and MaintenanceFrench-language works237,207