Quantum K-theoretic geometric Satake: the case
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The geometric Satake correspondence gives an equivalence of categories between the representations of a semisimple group $G$ and the spherical perverse sheaves on the affine Grassmannian $Gr$ of its Langlands dual group. Bezrukavnikov and Finkelberg developed a derived version of this equivalence which relates the derived category of $G^{\vee }$ -equivariant constructible sheaves on $Gr$ with the category of $G$ -equivariant ${\mathcal{O}}(\mathfrak{g})$ -modules. In this paper, we develop a K-theoretic version of the derived geometric Satake which involves the quantum group $U_{q}\mathfrak{g}$ . We define a convolution category $K\operatorname{Conv}(Gr)$ whose morphism spaces are given by the $G^{\vee }\times \mathbb{C}^{\times }$ -equivariant algebraic K-theory of certain fibre products. We conjecture that $K\operatorname{Conv}(Gr)$ is equivalent to a full subcategory of the category of $U_{q}\mathfrak{g}$ -equivariant ${\mathcal{O}}_{q}(G)$ -modules. We prove this conjecture when $G=\operatorname{SL}_{n}$ . A key tool in our proof is the $\operatorname{SL}_{n}$ spider, which is a combinatorial description of the category of $U_{q}\mathfrak{sl}_{n}$ representations. By applying horizontal trace, we show that the annular $\operatorname{SL}_{n}$ spider describes the category of $U_{q}\mathfrak{sl}_{n}$ -equivariant ${\mathcal{O}}_{q}(\operatorname{SL}_{n})$ -modules. Then we use quantum loop algebras to relate the annular $\operatorname{SL}_{n}$ spider to $K\operatorname{Conv}(Gr)$ . This gives a combinatorial/diagrammatic description of both categories and proves our conjecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it