Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract α‐Glucosidase inhibitors produce a significant reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and postprandial insulin with a significant decrease of HbA 1c (∼0.7%), by delaying carbohydrate absorption. For diabetic patients, α‐glucosidase inhibitors are safe agents that can be used either as monotherapy or in combination with other oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin. The reduction of HbA 1c should substantially decrease microvascular complications and could diminish macrovascular events. α‐Glucosidase inhibitors should be considered as a treatment of choice for newly diagnosed diabetic patients. For those not well‐controlled with any other type of treatment, it can result in metabolic improvement without any additional risk. To minimize gastrointestinal side effects, treatment should be initiated at a low dose and titrated slowly. In patients with impaired glucose tolerance, acarbose has proven to be efficient in preventing or delaying the occurrence of type 2 diabetes as well as decreasing macrovascular events.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it