MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1939302063 · doi:10.1109/pac.1995.505843

Wakefield effects on the beam accelerated in a photo injector: perturbation due to the exit aperture

2002· article· en· W1939302063 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings Particle Accelerator Conference · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotocathodes and Microchannel Plates
Canadian institutionsBruyère
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsPhysicsBeam (structure)Laser beam qualityAperture (computer memory)Perturbation (astronomy)Cathode rayInjectorBeam propagation methodBeam diameterLaser beamsElectronLaserNuclear physicsRefractive index

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of the photoinjector exit aperture on the wakefield generated by the strongly accelerated electron beam, has been theoretically studied in a companion paper. In this communication we study the effects of such a wakefield on the beam, in that propagation stage where the beam approaches the hole and enters it, i.e. the propagation stage where the influence of the photoinjector exit hole must be taken into account. First, the perturbated wakefield map (E, B)(x, t) is shown for various instants, and for photoinjector and beam parameters corresponding to typical values on ELSA, the CEA-Bruyeres-le Chatel high-current, high-brilliance electron beam facility. Then, the effects on the beam quality are studied in terms of emittances, when the beam approaches the hole. These effects are compared to the corresponding ones, previously obtained for a wakefield map where the exit hole perturbation had been neglected.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.127
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it