Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this interview on the occasion of the release of the ninth and final volume of the series Magasin Général, Régis Loisel and JeanLouis Tripp discuss the role of photography in Notre-Dame-des-Lacs, which concludes with an epilogue album in the form of drawn photos taken by one of the characters beginning in volume six and continuing eight years past the conclusion of volume nine. The interview analyzes the role of the camera and the photos in the series as markers of modernity, and discusses the technical, narrative, and visual tension between the real and the photographic representation of this fabled world. Sarah Hurlburt’s critical introduction to the interview analyzes the time period and setting for the series “1920’s rural Quebec” as the frame for a fable of modernity, a staging of the rapid social change brought forth by the first encounters of a rural, isolated community with the modern world. Résumé Dans cet entretien à l’occasion de la sortie du neuvième et dernier tome de la célèbre série bande dessinée Magasin Général, Régis Loisel et JeanLouis Tripp discutent le rôle de la photographie dans Notre- Dame-des-Lacs. Ce dernier tome de la série se termine avec un épilogue photographique composé des photos (dessinées) prises par un des personnages au cours des tomes antérieurs. Le faux album-photo continue après la fin de l’histoire, proposant en plus des images des huit années qui suivent la conclusion. La discussion interroge la tension visuelle, narrative et technique entre les représentations réelle et photographique de ce monde. L’introduction critique de Sarah Hurlburt analyse l’utilisation du cadre du Québec rural des années 1920 pour dramatiser les évolutions personnelles et sociales provoquées par ses premières rencontres avec le monde moderne, et présente le rôle de la caméra et des photos comme des symboles de cette modernité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".