A SIMPLE MODEL OF FUZZY IRRIGATION DEPTH CONTROL: AN APPLICATION OF AN INTELLIGENT STATE DROPPING (ISD) MECHANISM
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Irrigation scheduling is still a serious issue for water managers to achieve efficient water utilization. The dynamic nature of rainfall occurrence may lead to deep percolation, runoff and/or crop water stress, when the saturation allowance is not precisely determined for irrigation scheduling. In this paper, it was proposed to eliminate the fixed maximum allowable soil moisture from simulation‐based irrigation scheduling modeling and replace it with dynamic dependent values calculated by a fuzzy inference engine. In this case, the maximum allowable irrigation depth was not controlled by the field capacity level of soil moisture, and the saturation allowance is considered to store rain in the crop root zone. For this purpose, a classical simulation‐based irrigation scheduling model is modified based on an intelligent state dropping (ISD) mechanism. The theoretical basis of the ISD mechanism was previously developed by Ganji and Pouyan (2011). Application of the ISD mechanism considers water balance uncertainty by determining the maximum weekly allowable soil moisture (the level of saturation allowance). The proposed model is used to calculate a real case study of irrigation depth control of winter wheat, and the results are compared with classical irrigation depth control that considers a fixed level of saturation allowance. The results showed that the newly developed model of irrigation control depth effectively improves the results of classical models. As a result of 60 years of simulation, water loss and required irrigation depth were equal to (76.6, 1890) and (155, 2370) for the fuzzy and classical models, respectively. These results show a reduction in water loss of around 49%. It was also shown that although the total irrigation depth has been decreased for the fuzzy irrigation control model, the maximum crop water demand was supplied by the proposed fuzzy model completely. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".