MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1943991695 · doi:10.1002/atr.1193

Improved rehandling strategies for the container retrieval process

2012· article· en· W1943991695 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tonguç Ünlüyurt, Cenk Aydın

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContainer (type theory)HeuristicsFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceReliability (semiconductor)Operations researchProcess (computing)Branch and boundHeuristicWork (physics)Mathematical optimizationVolume (thermodynamics)Sequence (biology)Transport engineeringEngineeringAlgorithmMathematicsMechanical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY The breakdown of trade barriers among countries led to an enormous increase in the volume of international trade. Consequently, the amount of bulk cargo carried in containers and transported overseas exploded because of flexibility and reliability of this type of transportation. So, the efficiency in container terminals has emerged as a major problem. In this work, we deal with an operational problem in container terminals. We try to develop strategies to minimize the total time required to retrieve the containers from a bay in a predetermined sequence. The problem is solved optimally using a branch and bound‐based algorithm, and alternative heuristics that give near‐optimal solutions are proposed. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207