Entropy‐Based Spatial Interaction Models for Trip Distribution. 基于熵的空间相互作用模型在出行分布中的应用
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Wilson's use of entropy‐maximization techniques to derive a family of spatial interaction models was a major innovation in urban and regional modeling. The work elegantly linked methods for transportation analysis and regional economics into a unified framework. One version, the doubly constrained spatial interaction model, is closely related to the transportation problem of linear programming and other existing trip distribution techniques. This article traces some of these connections, particularly the sense in which an entropy model with an average trip length constraint can be seen as a relaxation of a least cost solution to a linear program. These ideas have renewed significance in the context of studies of simulation models for regional economies. Wilson's developments therefore provided a unifying basis for the work of very creative urban and regional modelers of that time (e.g., Alonso, Batty, Evans, Harris, Herbert, Lakshmanan, Stevens, Webber) and indicate the lasting and significant influence of his insight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it