MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W194642409

Bovine Surgery and lameness, 2nd ed.

2007· article· en· W194642409 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed Central · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicVeterinary Practice and Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLamenessMedicineCurriculumComplaintMedical educationPsychologySurgeryPedagogyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I bought a copy of the 1st edition of this text when I was an undergraduate veterinary student. The purchase was based primarily upon the book’s preface that states “This book aims to give the nuts and bolts of practical bovine surgery and lameness.” I wanted a book to supplement what I felt was a deficiency in my undergraduate curriculum to prepare me for what I hoped would be a career in food animal practice. We had received almost no practical tuition in food animal surgery and only a couple of lectures on lameness. In contrast, my student placements during my vacation time had shown me that food animal practitioners (particularly dairy practitioners) spent a lot of time dealing with lameness and that surgery in one form or another was performed on almost a daily basis. This book seemed ideal. Unfortunately, I was disappointed; my biggest complaint was that the book wasn’t what it claimed to be. It was a good general surgery text but if you wanted to look something up quickly to immediately prepare for a surgery it was not that helpful. In particular, it was lacking in illustrations, which made visualizing the surgical techniques and landmarks difficult. Consequently, the book was placed on my bookshelf and has remained there ever since. I was very interested to see the new edition of this book. There are 2 new authors and the cover indicates that there are new illustrations to “aid instruction”. The book has kept the same basic format as its predecessor. In particular it is written in a clear note form which emphasizes key points and makes the text very accessible. The text is extensively cross- referenced by section and page number, which prevents repetition and is easy to use. A quick flick through the book demonstrates that there are a great many more illustrations than the 1st edition, but they are all line drawings and schematics. There are no photographs, which is disappointing given the current ease of digital image manipulation. I appreciate that the authors are probably trying to ensure that the book is affordable, but a small number of photographs would have been very beneficial especially in the lameness sections (see below). The 1st chapter starts with some basic surgical principles. The section on local anaesthetic blocks is particularly good and well illustrated, although there is limited information on methods of restraint to accompany the anesthesia techniques. The authors mention a number of drugs which would be used in an extra-label manner in Canada, unfortunately no mention is made of using the Canadian office of Global FARAD to estimate appropriate withdrawal interval following such use. The next section covers the head and neck. There has been some considerable improvement in this section especially the number of illustrations which allow the text to be understood on its 1st reading. The section on dehorning techniques is very good, some illustrations would have assisted in the section on enucleation. The section on abdominal surgery is also much improved with more illustrations and much better specific information on the details of the specific surgeries. The sections on abomasal surgery and umbilical surgery are especially good. After reading these 1st sections it immediately struck me that the book is now much more practical for daily use and more closely meets the original intention of the 1st edition. The next sections focus on female urogenital surgery, teat surgery, and male urogenital surgery. In each chapter the same theme continues of more illustrations and a very practical text. Routine surgeries are particularly well described. My main disappointment with the book was the lameness section. I appreciate that as I deal with cattle lameness on a daily basis, I bring my own biases, but I expected more from a book with “lameness” in the title. The section has been expanded from the previous edition but it really suffers from a lack of illustrations. I believe that diagnosis of lameness depends primarily on pattern recognition. If you know what the condition looks like you can make the diagnosis. The descriptions in the text are very good, but a color photograph of the lesions would be incredibly helpful. There is also no information on how to approach a lame cow in order to determine the diagnosis, and the section on foot trimming is very short and really does not offer enough information to deal with most cattle lameness. In contrast, the surgeries of the foot are well described. In conclusion, the 2nd edition of this book has made some major improvements on the 1st edition. In particular, the book is now much more accessible. I also found that in coming back to the book after so many years that the book was actually more useful than I remembered it to be. It is a good general cattle surgery text for anyone with an interest in cattle practice. I believe that this book would be a good choice for a student or a recent graduate who wishes to either review cattle surgery as a whole, or needs a reference text for those unusual or “first time cases.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.176
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it