MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1946870626 · doi:10.1049/iet-spr.2014.0347

Incremental algorithm for finding principal curves

2015· article· en· W1946870626 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Signal Processing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Rehabilitation Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmDimensionality reductionPrincipal component analysisData setSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceRepresentation (politics)Subspace topologyPrincipal (computer security)Curse of dimensionalitySequence (biology)MathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Principal curves are a non‐linear generalisation of principal components. They are smooth curves that pass through the middle of a data set to provide a new representation of those data to make tasks, such as visualisation and dimensionality reduction easier and more accurate. The subspace constrained mean shift (SCMS) algorithm is a recently proposed technique to find principal curves. The algorithm assumes that the complete data set is available in advance and that new data points cannot be added to the data set during the process. The algorithm finds the points on the principal curves by using the complete data set. In this paper, the authors investigate the situation where the entire data set is not available in advance and instead are sampled sequentially. They propose an incremental version of the SCMS algorithm that trains using a sequence of observations. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm to find a principal curve using a stream of observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it