MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1946904586 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2001.933563

Context-based media adaptation in pervasive computing

2002· article· en· W1946904586 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptation (eye)Computer scienceUbiquitous computingContext (archaeology)The InternetContent adaptationContext awarenessMultimediaMobile deviceWorld Wide WebHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In pervasive computing applications, computer embedded devices are used to perform control tasks and access the Internet or other information sources. However, most content of current information sources was designed with desktop computers and high-speed network connections in mind. They contain rich media data, which are not suitable for those pervasive devices with limited capabilities. Moreover, for different user preference and application scenarios, not all of the data are relevant and critical to the application. Context-based media adaptation is mainly concerned with selecting different qualities of single media types or selecting different media types, and then delivering information to different context. Some related issues for building a general context-based media adaptation framework are discussed. These issues include context description and exchange schemes, adaptable model for managing and manipulating multimedia content, adaptation techniques and architectural issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it