MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1949754115 · doi:10.1109/robot.1999.774048

Sensor fusion based on fuzzy Kalman filtering for autonomous robot vehicle

2003· article· en· W1949754115 on OpenAlexaff
Jurek Z. Sąsiadek, Qiying Wang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtended Kalman filterKalman filterSensor fusionFuzzy logicComputer scienceFast Kalman filterFuse (electrical)Inertial navigation systemControl theory (sociology)Computer visionMobile robotArtificial intelligenceGlobal Positioning SystemNoise (video)GPS/INSInvariant extended Kalman filterControl engineeringEngineeringRobotOrientation (vector space)Assisted GPSMathematicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presents a method of sensor fusion based on adaptive fuzzy Kalman filtering. This method has been applied to fuse position signals from the Global Positioning System (GPS) and inertial navigation system (INS) for autonomous mobile vehicles. The presented method has been validated in a 3-D environment and is of particular importance for guidance, navigation, and control of flying vehicles. The extended Kalman filter (EKF) and the noise characteristic have been modified using a fuzzy logic adaptive system and compared with the performance of the regular EKF. It has been demonstrated that the fuzzy adaptive Kalman filter gives better results (more accurate) than the EKF.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations98
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInertial Sensor and NavigationFrench-language works237,207