Design of the Study: Selecting Societies of Settlement and Immigrant Groups
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter describes the design and the contextual backgrounds of the societies of settlement and the immigrant groups involved in the International Comparative Study of Ethnocultural Youth project. The chapter presents descriptions of some of the core features of the 13 societies of settlement that are theoretically relevant to the project. It outlines some of the important features of the immigrant groups, including information that is necessary for understanding the processes of acculturation and adaptation that occur as they interact with others in their societies of settlement. The chapter focuses on societies that have been largely built using a deliberate process of immigration. It analyses societies that have been involved in immigration but historically were the source of immigrants rather than the destination. The chapter explores the differences using two indicators that are theoretically important for this project: the actual degree of cultural diversity found in a society and the national policy orientation toward such diversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it