MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W195373846

Video Game Presence as a Function of Genre: A Preliminary Inquiry

2011· article· en· W195373846 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLoading... · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsMacEwan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCasualAdventureAction (physics)Video gameRealismVideo game designGame mechanicsFunction (biology)Game designCore (optical fiber)Similarity (geometry)PsychologyArtMultimediaComputer scienceLiteratureArtificial intelligenceArt historyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While presence, or the sense of being there, is widely understood to be important in game play, it has not been examined in terms of video game genre. In the present inquiry various forms of self reported presence during a recently played game were examined as a function of three general classes of genre. These included casual games (i.e., puzzle and Kart Racing), hard core games (i.e., 1st person shooter, action-adventure and role-playing) and real world games (i.e., music and sports). It was found that while the casual genre’s had the least presence overall they were no different in self reported absorption or game satisfaction than the other two genre types. Sociability was highest in the hard core game genre types as was the realism of 3D effects. Finally, the real world genre were most characterized by the perceived sense of similarity to the real world, thus the label.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it