MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1958517529 · doi:10.1080/1359756042000245151

The growth of English regionalism? institutions and identity

2004· article· en· W1958517529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRegional & Federal Studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsInstitute on Governance
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRegionalism (politics)Political scienceIdentity (music)State (computer science)Political economyPerspective (graphical)Economic geographyRegional developmentDevelopment economicsSociologyGeographyRegional scienceEconomicsPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article assesses the current state and possible future development of English regionalism through a specific focus on the question of identity in the North East and South East of England. Although popular regionalism is comparatively weak, and identity in the form of cultural resources does not tend to be available or mobilized at an institutional level, it is argued that a modest popular and institutional base, together with the capacity for nascent regional organizations to present a more region-centred perspective based on economic attributes, creates the potential for the future growth of regionalism in England.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.646
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.105
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it