MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1958677227 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2004.1345230

Models and tools for simulation of video transmission on wireless networks

2004· article· en· W1958677227 on OpenAlexaff
Zhu Han, Ashraf Matrawy, L. Lambadaris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Coding and Compression Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMPEG-4ScalabilityScalable Video CodingWireless networkWirelessData compressionReal-time computingCoding (social sciences)Computer networkArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robust transmission of video is a dominant requirement of future applications over wireless networks. MPEG-4 is an object based video encoding technique which is suitable for wireless applications due to its high compression performance, scalable video coding techniques, error-resilient capability and object-based coding functionalities. In this paper, we first model traces of MPEG-4 traffic. Based on these models, we develop tools for MPEG-4 traffic generation. These tools have an adaptive rate control-function that is capable of simulating MPEG-4's scalable video coding. These tools can be used as source traffic generator in network simulators. This enables the study of MPEG-4 transmission performance over wireless networks by using simulation. We model and generate the traffic based on the transform expand sample (TES) methodology. In our experiment, we generate MPEG-4 traffic and show the performance in terms of good matching of the characteristics of the modeled traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Coding and Compression TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207