MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1959038507 · doi:10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3862

THE USE OF PRODUCT DATA MANAGEMENT (PDM) SOFTWARE TO SUPPORT STUDENT DESIGN PROJECTS

2011· article· en· W1959038507 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ralph O. Buchal

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicManufacturing Process and Optimization
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduct data managementVariety (cybernetics)Product (mathematics)Data managementSoftware engineeringData sharingSoftwareComputer scienceEngineering managementSystems engineeringNew product developmentEngineeringProduct lifecycleDatabaseOperating systemBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industry recognizes the central importance of managing and sharing CAD data within the organization, and powerful Product Data Management (PDM) systems have been developed to address this need However, engineering schools have been slow to adopt PDM technology, and student design teams typically rely on a variety of ad hoc approaches to manage shared CAD data. To address the PDM requirements of student projects, the University of Western Ontario acquired and deployed PDMWorks in January 2006. PDMWorks is a midrange PDM system for SolidWorks. Installation and administration of this midrange product are very straightforward, and its tight integration with SolidWorks makes PDMWorks easy to use. However, PDMWorks is best suited to relatively small workgroups, and does not scale easily to large numbers of users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.170 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)Same topicManufacturing Process and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207