MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1960350521 · doi:10.1080/15427609.2015.1068034

Research that Helps Move Us Closer to a World Where Each Child Thrives

2015· article· en· W1960350521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch in Human Development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicYouth Development and Social Support
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsMartial artsDanceThe artsCausality (physics)PsychologyPerforming artsSocial psychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceSociologyVisual artsArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Schools are curtailing programs in arts, physical exercise, and play to devote more time and resources to academic instruction. Yet doing that may impede academic success, rather than aid it. Correlational and retrospective studies, personal accounts, case studies, and theoretical arguments suggest that the arts (e.g., music, dance, and theatre) and/or physical activities (e.g., sports, martial arts, and youth circus) can transform kids’ lives. Do they? Causal studies are lacking. There’s enough suggestive evidence; the time is ripe for rigorous research on real-world arts and physical activity programs that permit conclusions about causality to be drawn and that investigate what characteristics of programs account for benefits. Granting agencies should be more open to funding such research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.389
GPT teacher head0.504
Teacher spread0.115 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it