MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963512686 · doi:10.3138/carto.46.3.200

Damage Assessment of the 2011 Japanese Tsunami Using High-Resolution Satellite Data

2011· article· en· W1963512686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guido Cervone, Germana Manca

Bibliographic record

VenueCartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersU.S. Geological SurveyNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
KeywordsGeological surveyGeologySeismologySatelliteIndian oceanGeographyOceanographyGeophysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Department of Geography and Geoinformation Science / George Mason University / Fairfax / VA / USAIntroductionOn 11 March 2011 at 05:46 UTC, a massive Mw 9.0underwater earthquake occurred 70 km off the easterncoast of Japan. The location of the earthquake was trian-gulated by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) to38.322 N 142.369 E, and the hypocentre was computedto 32 km beneath the surface. Figure 1 shows a map ofthe earthquakes that occurred between 1 and 10 March2011 (a) and between 11 and 31 March 2011 (b). Theearthquake of 11 March generated a tsunami that rapidlyhit the eastern coast of Japan and propagated across thePacific Ocean to the western coast of the Americas. Atsunami warning was issued by the National Oceanic andAtmospheric Agency (NOAA) affecting all countries withcoastline along the Pacific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCartographica The International Journal for Geographic Information and GeovisualizationSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207