MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1963659587 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2014-008-x

On Varieties of Lie Algebras of Maximal Class

2014· article· en· W1963659587 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Algebra and Geometry
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical SciencesWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsIsomorphism (crystallography)Pure mathematicsClass (philosophy)Lie algebraType (biology)Killing formProperty (philosophy)Lie conformal algebraAlgebra over a fieldAdjoint representation of a Lie algebraComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study complex projective varieties that parametrize (finite-dimensional) filiform Lie algebras over ℂ, using equations derived by Millionshchikov. In the infinite-dimensional case we concentrate our attention on ℕ-graded Lie algebras of maximal class. As shown by A. Fialowski there are only three isomorphism types of ℕ-graded Lie algebras of maximal class generated by L 1 and L 2 , L = 〈 L 1 ; L 2 〉. Vergne described the structure of these algebras with the property L = 〈 L 1 〉. In this paper we study those generated by the first and q-th components where q > 2, L = 〈 L 1 ; L q 〉. Under some technical condition, there can only be one isomorphism type of such algebras. For q = 3 we fully classify them. This gives a partial answer to a question posed by Millionshchikov.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.565

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it