Modeling the Influence of Dye Distribution on the Perceived Color Depth of a Filament Array
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model of the reflection, refraction, and absorption of light rays by a dyed cylindrical filament according to classical laws of optics. Overall light transmit tance and reflectance of a single filament are then assumed to apply to a complete layer of such filaments. The optical behavior of the entire filament array is derived by adding successive filament layers with the same or different amounts and distributions of dye. Each filament contains a light-absorbing dye that may be evenly distributed throughout it, or located in a ring close to the filament periphery (ring dyed). The model also considers the case where only filaments near the surface of the array are colored, while those in the interior are not. The calculations predict how the various different distributions of the dye in the filament array influence the perceived color depth. The results are discussed in relation to previous work and to practical dyeing experience.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it