Study of the Reaction of Lithium with Isostructural A[sub 2]B and Various Al[sub x]B Alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The electrochemical alloying reaction of Li with isostructural and Al‐base alloys has been investigated. The binary alloys we selected are isostructural and comprise an active element (A) that alloys with lithium, and an inactive one (B) that does not. These compounds were prepared by mechanical alloying and have small grain size (10–20 nm). With the exception of , we observed a full reaction of A with lithium ( , where the theoretical values of x are 1 for Sb, and 4.4 for Si, Ge, and Sn). Extremely slow electrochemical cycling at 55°C and potentiostatic tests at lithium potential proved the total inactivity of the vs. lithium. However, thermodynamic considerations predict that the reaction of with Li should occur and that the formation of LiAl should be observed. Other Al‐transition metal intermetallics were studied and were also found to be inert toward Li, suggesting that the Al‐transition metal bond has unique features. © 2000 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".