MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1964365003 · doi:10.1149/1.1393421

Study of the Reaction of Lithium with Isostructural A[sub 2]B and Various Al[sub x]B Alloys

2000· article· en· W1964365003 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsostructuralLithium (medication)IntermetallicElectrochemistryTransition metalMaterials scienceInertMetalInorganic chemistryChemistryCrystallographyPhysical chemistryMetallurgyCrystal structureElectrodeAlloyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The electrochemical alloying reaction of Li with isostructural and Al‐base alloys has been investigated. The binary alloys we selected are isostructural and comprise an active element (A) that alloys with lithium, and an inactive one (B) that does not. These compounds were prepared by mechanical alloying and have small grain size (10–20 nm). With the exception of , we observed a full reaction of A with lithium (, where the theoretical values of x are 1 for Sb, and 4.4 for Si, Ge, and Sn). Extremely slow electrochemical cycling at 55°C and potentiostatic tests at lithium potential proved the total inactivity of the vs. lithium. However, thermodynamic considerations predict that the reaction of with Li should occur and that the formation of LiAl should be observed. Other Al‐transition metal intermetallics were studied and were also found to be inert toward Li, suggesting that the Al‐transition metal bond has unique features. © 2000 The Electrochemical Society. All rights reserved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it