MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Elevated Serum β-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin in Nonpregnant Conditions

2007· review· en· W1964657659 on OpenAlexaff
Ezgi Demirtaş, Srinivasan Krishnamurthy, Togas Tulandi

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman chorionic gonadotropinPregnancyGonadotropinHormoneChemotherapyGerm cell tumorsImmunohistochemistryInternal medicineTrophoblastic neoplasmGynecologyGestationEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Positive serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) in reproductive-age women generally indicates a pregnancy, and to a lesser extent, gestational trophoblastic disease, ovarian or peripheral germ cell tumor. Besides gynecologic conditions, nongynecologic cancers can be associated with beta-hCG positivity as well. The hormone in these tumors varies from detection by the immunohistochemistry studies of the tumor tissue only to a high serum level. This is illustrated by our case report of a 26-year-old woman who was diagnosed with a spindle cell osteosarcoma of the shoulder. The serum beta-hCG became undetectable after chemotherapy. TARGET AUDIENCE: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning OBJECTIVES: After completion of this article, the reader should be able to recall that elevated serum hCG can be related to pregnancy, gestational neoplasias, and ovarian and nongynecologic tumors and explain that it is important to appreciate that the hCG detected in these conditions may differ in type and be a marker of the success of treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.189
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicHypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesFrench-language works237,207