A Bayesian Approach to the Multistate Jolly–Seber Capture–Recapture Model
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers a Bayesian approach to the multistate extension of the Jolly-Seber model commonly used to estimate population abundance in capture-recapture studies. It extends the work of George and Robert (1992, Biometrika79, 677-683), which dealt with the Bayesian estimation of a closed population with only a single state for all animals. A super-population is introduced to model new entrants in the population. Bayesian estimates of abundance are obtained by implementing a Gibbs sampling algorithm based on data augmentation of the missing data in the capture histories when the state of the animal is unknown. Moreover, a partitioning of the missing data is adopted to ensure the convergence of the Gibbs sampling algorithm even in the presence of impossible transitions between some states. Lastly, we apply our methodology to a population of fish to estimate abundance and movement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it