MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965106458 · doi:10.1103/physreve.72.056304

Surface-thermal capacity of<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>from measurements made during steady-state evaporation

2005· article· lv· W1965106458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2005
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsThermal conductionThermodynamicsHeat capacityThermalConvectionHeat fluxGibbs free energyEvaporationEnergy (signal processing)Materials sciencePhysicsHeat transfer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When ${\mathrm{D}}_{2}\mathrm{O}(l)$ evaporates into its vapor under steady-state conditions with the temperature field in the liquid arranged so that there is no buoyancy-driven convection and the Marangoni number is less than $\ensuremath{\sim}100$, it is found that the interface is quiescent and thermal conduction to the interface supplies energy at a sufficient rate to evaporate the liquid. However, if the evaporation rate is raised so that the Marangoni number goes above $\ensuremath{\sim}100$, the interface is transformed: a fluctuating thermocapillary flow occurs, and thermal conduction no longer supplies energy at a sufficient rate to evaporate the liquid. An energy analysis indicates conservation of energy can be satisfied only if thermocapillary convection is taken into account, and the surface-thermal capacity ${c}_{\ensuremath{\sigma}}$ is assigned a value of $32.5\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.8\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{kJ}∕({\mathrm{m}}^{2}\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\mathrm{K})$ when the temperature is in the range $\ensuremath{-}10\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}\ensuremath{\leqslant}{T}^{LV}\ensuremath{\leqslant}3.7\phantom{\rule{0.2em}{0ex}}\ifmmode^\circ\else\textdegree\fi{}\mathrm{C}$. This value is consistent with that found previously for ${\mathrm{H}}_{2}\mathrm{O}$, and application of the Gibbs model gives a qualitative explanation for the value. Once the value of the surface-thermal capacity is known, the local heat flux along the interface can be calculated and statistical rate theory can be used to predict the local vapor-phase pressure on the interface. Since this theory introduces no adjustable parameters, the predicted pressure can be compared directly with that measured: this comparison indicates the mean of the pressures predicted to exist on the interface is in close agreement with those measured $\ensuremath{\sim}20\phantom{\rule{0.3em}{0ex}}\mathrm{cm}$ above the interface, and the small pressure gradient along the interface is consistent with the thermocapillary convection predicted from the interfacial temperature gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1880.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it