MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1965414749 · doi:10.1080/00220388.2014.947279

Does Female Reservation Affect Long-Term Political Outcomes? Evidence from Rural India

2014· article· en· W1965414749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Development Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreWorld Bank Group
KeywordsReservationBeijingChinaHuman capitalPoliticsEconomic growthAgriculturePolitical scienceState (computer science)EconomicsRural developmentDevelopment economicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although many studies have explored the
\n impacts of political quotas for females, often with
\n ambiguous results, the underlying mechanisms and long-term
\n effects have received little attention. This paper uses
\n nation-wide data from India spanning a 15-year period to
\n explore how reservations affect leader qualifications,
\n service delivery, political participation, local
\n accountability, and individuals willingness to contribute
\n to public goods. Although leader quality declines and
\n impacts on service quality are often negative, gender quotas
\n are shown to increase the level and quality of women's
\n political participation, the ability to hold leaders to
\n account, and the willingness to contribute to public goods.
\n Key effects persist beyond the reserved period and impacts
\n on females often materialize only with a lag.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it