MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Avaliação psicológica de obesos grau III antes e depois de Cirurgia Bariátrica

2009· article· pt· W1965936402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsicologia Reflexão e Crítica · 2009
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicEating Disorders and Behaviors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avalia depressão, ansiedade, sintomas psicopatológicos, alexitimia e estilo defensivo de obesos grau III, antes e depois de cirurgia bariátrica. O estudo seguiu delineamento quase-experimental, de tipo cross-sectional. Contou com grupo pré-cirúrgico (Gr1, N=32) e pós-cirúrgico (Gr2, N=33), entre seis e 33 meses após a cirurgia. Instrumentos: Inventário de Depressão de Beck (BDI), Inventário de Ansiedade de Beck (BAI), Escala de Avaliação de Sintomas (EAS-40), Versão em Português da Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto (TAS-26) e Versão em Português do Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). Os dois grupos apresentaram baixos níveis de depressão, ansiedade, sintomas psicopatológicos e alexitimia. No entanto, os níveis do Gr 2 foram significantemente inferiores (p<0,05). Em relação ao estilo defensivo, o Gr1 apresentou mais defesas imaturas (p<0,02) do que o Gr 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.576
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it