MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966189352 · doi:10.1353/lab.2005.0093

Black Workers' Struggle for Equality in Birmingham (review)

2005· article· en· W1966189352 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLabor Studies Journal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRace, History, and American Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSociologyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Black Workers' Struggle for Equality in Birmingham Susan W. Thomas Black Workers' Struggle for Equality in Birmingham. Edited by Horace Huntley and David Montgomery. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2004. 244 pp. $35 hardback. A compilation of seventeen oral interviews gleaned from the Oral History Project of the Birmingham Civil Rights Institute, Black Workers' Struggle for Equality in Birmingham supplements the increasing number of historical works focusing on the link between civil rights and labor activism. The selected interviews provide a personal view of the city's black working class history as they emphasize the ways in which labor organizing benefited them in the workplace and beyond. With few exceptions, the interviews highlight workers' realization that "the Civil Rights Movement would not have been able to do a lot of things . . . had it not been for the labor movement." Although Birmingham has a well-known history of activism during the decades of the Civil Rights Movement, the purpose here is to uncover the hidden history of black workers who organized in the workplace and battled racism on all fronts. David Montgomery provides an analytical twenty-five page overview of the formation of the black working class in Birmingham, a post-bellum industrial city that drew poor whites and blacks into the mines and factories throughout the early twentieth century. Carefully examining the connections between black workers' activism and their concurrent participation in the struggle for racial equality in the wider community, Montgomery outlines the development of the city's industrial base and the role of legally sanctioned segregation in defining black lives. While Montgomery's introduction is useful for placing the interviews in historical context, the accounts themselves are valuable for providing a fresh perspective on how black workers understood their own lives. The editors preface each interview with brief biographical remarks and provide useful footnotes for clarification, when necessary. Many of the interviews focus on the significance of the black church (particularly in relation to the work of Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth) as a source of spiritual support in the fight against discrimination and for civil rights. Several interviewees indicate that their involvement in the church either ignited their consciousness to the cause of civil rights or enabled them to bring their rights consciousness borne in the workplace to their neighborhoods. Although the title indicates that these will be remembrances of life and work in Birmingham, a number of those interviewed provide information about conditions in other large cities, including Chicago. In addition, not all of those whose interviews appear were blacks. Eula McGill, a well-known white union organizer and activist, explains in her own words the rationale [End Page 118] for including her interview in this volume: "We had to fight for our Civil Rights. So many people think Civil Rights are just black rights. Civil Rights are everybody's rights. They are human rights." Accessible to a broad audience, Black Workers' Struggle for Equality in Birmingham will prove useful as a resource in undergraduate labor history courses and for students seeking easy access to compelling documentary evidence of the close ties between black workers' participation in labor organizing and their battle for civil rights. Montgomery's analytical introduction will benefit all who are concerned with issues of race and labor. Susan W. Thomas University of North Carolina Copyright © 2006 the West Virginia University Press, for the United Association for Labor Studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it