MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966227371 · doi:10.1134/s1062739147020092

Evaluating capital investment timing with stochastic modeling of time-dependent variables in open pit optimization

2011· article· en· W1966227371 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mining Science · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsGolder Associates (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNet present valueCommodityEconomicsInvestment (military)Mathematical optimizationStochastic modellingOpen-pit miningPresent valueCapital investmentSet (abstract data type)EconometricsCapital (architecture)Value (mathematics)Limit (mathematics)Stochastic optimizationComputer scienceProduction (economics)EngineeringMicroeconomicsMathematicsFinanceMining engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new approach to optimizing the timing of capital investment in open pit mines is suggested and demonstrated in an application at a large copper deposit. The approach considers explicitly the uncertain nature of the commodity price cycle and operating costs that can be modelled via stochastic simulation techniques. The stochastic models of prices and costs are fed directly into either a set of nested pits or a direct net present value (NPV) optimization algorithm. This avoids divorcing the delineation of an open mine’s pit limit from calculating the related NPV that is common in traditional approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it