MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1966389448 · doi:10.1177/0308275x09104083

Between Flexible Life and Flexible Labor

2009· article· en· W1966389448 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCritique of Anthropology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Industrial and Economic Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeft-wing politicsNeoliberalism (international relations)SocialismCapitalismAuthoritarianismState socialismIndividualismPolitical economyState (computer science)SociologyDemocracyPolitical scienceCommunismPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

■ This article contextualizes the historical emergence of liberal socialism (socialism with a strong stance against the state and social power over individual) in South Korea and its inadvertent convergence with neoliberalism. By observing experiences of three leftist single independent women who embodied liberal socialism through the democratization movement towards neoliberalization (1987—2007), this article situates ways in which South Korean leftist intellectuals enjoy a flexible lifestyle and at the same time criticize flexible labor. On the one hand, the article elucidates that liberal individualism was both means and product of socialist struggles against the late-developing authoritarian capitalist state in South Korea. However, it argues that socialist adaptation of liberal values is no longer effective in countering a neoliberal capitalism that requires flexible labor and autonomous individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it